|
The Hills Have Eyes (2-Disc Edition) | 
 enlarge | Director: Wes Craven
Actors: Susan Lanier, Robert Houston, Martin Speer, Dee Wallace, Russ Grieve
Studio: Vanguard
Category: DVD
List Price: $19.98
Buy Used: $2.45
You Save: $17.53 (88%)
New (54) Used (35) Collectible (3) from $2.45
Avg. Customer Rating:  88 reviews
Sales Rank: 40700
Format: Closed-captioned, Color, Dolby, Dts Surround Sound, Dvd-video, Special Edition, Widescreen, Ntsc
Languages: English (Original Language), English (Published)
Rating: X (Mature Audiences Only)
Number Of Items: 2
Running Time: 89
Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.4
Dimensions (in): 7.4 x 5.1 x 0.6
MPN: ANBD12577D
UPC: 013131257793
EAN: 0013131257793
ASIN: B00009V7QM
Theatrical Release Date: July 22, 1977
Release Date: September 23, 2003
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: International shipping available
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
On the way to california a family has the misfortune to have their car break down in an area closed to the public and inhabited by violent savages ready to attack. Studio: Starz/sphe Release Date: 02/28/2006 Starring: Susan Lanier Martin Speer Run time: 89 minutes Rating: Ur Director: Wes Craven
Amazon.com
Fans of Wes Craven's more recent major studio work (the Scream series) may be put off by the low-budget griminess of his sophomore feature, The Hills Have Eyes, but the director's longtime supporters and aficionados of '70s horror will be riveted by this unsettling culture clash fable. Originally titled Blood Relations, Hills strands a suburban family (which includes E.T.'s Dee Wallace Stone and future documentarian Robert Houston) in the desert and pits them against a clan of inbred cannibals. The resourceful killer brood quickly decimates the outsiders' numbers, forcing the survivors to fight back with equally savage means. Like Craven's debut, Last House on the Left, Hills is a relentlessly tense film which demolishes numerous societal taboos (fratricide and infant kidnapping, for starters), but it also delivers a powerful subtext about family and the fine line between civilization and animal behavior amidst the mayhem. Highly recommended for Craven completists and fans of no-holds-barred horror. --Paul Gaita
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 83 more reviews...
Thriller/ Suspence April 27, 2008
This movie is a great thriller/suspence filled one.
Not as ''scary'' or gorey as thought.
Very good - 2 thumbs up!
Classic Craven April 12, 2008
To this day, The Hills Have Eyes remains one of Wes Craven's more notable films as well as establishing its place as a horror classic in general. Although the plot is a tad reminiscient of Tobe Hooper's Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Hills is still a solid piece of low budget horror.
Opening with some great eerie footage of the isolated desert hills, we meet the California bound Carter family as they make a stop at a dilapidated gas station. Following an ill advised shortcut, they end up in a car crash stranded deep in the outlying desert, but more importantly in the "air force testing range" where a family of deranged cannibalistic savages dwells. Using their knowledge of the desert and some guerilla warfare-like tactics, the mutant tribe begins exterminating the Carters one by one until a select few remain in the struggle for survival. The remaining family members band together to exact their revenge on the cannibals as well as escape the desert with their lives.
Hills really utilizes the creepy desert scenery to create an unsettling vibe as well as imposing feelings of unfamiliarity, helplessness, and simply being alone. As a person who likes a horror film with atmosphere often more than one with gore, Hills is a great example of how important a creepy vibe can play into a movie. I feel the film has aged to a point to where it would not offend a frequent horror-goer, but at the same it is never boring and certainly interesting enough storywise to keep you entertained. Also that's not to say that there isn't some good gory content present afterall, we have a moderate amount of bloodletting here as well as a gruesome death by burning, and a memorable scene with a caged parakeet.
The characters are all generally well acted and likable, the Carters and the cannibals alike featuring some great performances from Dee Wallace, James Whitworth and of course Michael Berryman as Pluto. I feel that some of the film's attributes were better demonstrated in the recent remake such as the back story it provided on the cannibals, which was rather weak in this original, but we'll save that for another review. All in all The Hills Have Eyes is a cool little movie that should be in every horror fan's library, check this one out.
 A Terrible Classic March 21, 2008
2 out of 2 found this review helpful
This is a genuinely bad movie that only true horror buffs will appreciate. It's definitely a classic of the genre, but that doesn't mean it's not a turd. A classic turd is still a turd.
Bad actors, bad dialogue, bad pacing, bad music, bad production values, bad direction, just...plain...bad...
Good January 13, 2008
Good B movie is all it is. Don't expect a lot out of it.
Really not that "scary". August 25, 2007
1 out of 3 found this review helpful
My favorite movie genre is horror. There's just something about not knowing what's going to happen that gives me goosebumps. That being said, I'm not a really big fan of older scary movies. The lame effects, the far from scary evil guys, and the typical storylines just don't do anything for me. So when the remake of The Hills Have Eyes came out, I thought I'd watch the original before watching the remake. As you can tell from my 2 star rating, I was less than pleased.
I never did get to watch the remake. The reason why? I figured that if the remake was anything like the original, it wouldn't be worth my time. And truthfully, I didn't even watch the entire movie because it was *that* uninteresting to me.
But let's try to be positive for a second. Let's talk about the few things I liked about the movie. Although you'll hear a lot in this review that it just wasn't that scary, there were a couple of scenes that were too real to go unnoticed. There is one thing I like about older scary movies-the smallest details make the events more realistic. Little things like the length of a scene, the amount of sound, even the lack of gore make this movie just a tad more creepy. If I had to come up with another positive it would be that the acting is pretty decent for an older movie.
And now for the negatives. The first thing I must bring up is that this movie moves along rather slowly. Some scenes could have been taken out. Some scenes should've been shorter. Some scenes were repetitive. This was ultimately the reason why I had to stop watching the movie. Secondly, as I mentioned above, the "scary" guys were not scary at all. If the audience isn't afraid of the supposed "scary" person, that ruins the point of the film. Lastly, there's a lack of a climax which left me completely frustrated.
Bottom line-I'd go ahead and skip this one if you're looking for something truly scary.
|
|
|
video game stores
Copyright ©2006-2007 All rights reserved.
| Links | |
Computer Games, Video Games, PC Games, Computer Video Games, Xbox, Xbox Games, Playstation 2, PS2, PS2 Games, PSP, Game Boy, Game Boy Advance, Nintendo, Nintendo DS, Grand Theft Auto, Warcraft, Action Games, Kid's Games, Children's Games, Dreamcast, Battlefield 2, Sims, Madden, Warcraft
Shipping Information Privacy Policy Disclaimer plasma tv review plasma tv reviews uk digital picture frame digital camera review canon digital cameras sony ericsson music videos garden furniture video games stores
|
|
|
|
| |
